Search found 33 matches

by rasta
Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:07 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

So far, it looks like v4.2 build 2005 solves all problems related to attaching on Solaris 10 x86! Good job, 4front!!! :D
by rasta
Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:39 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you very much for making the change. :D
by rasta
Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:59 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Cesium noticed that the oss source adds a 'ddi-no-autoattach' line under Solaris 9: [code="setup/SunOS/confgen.c"]#ifdef SOL9 fprintf (conf, "ddi-no-autodetach=1 ddi-forceattach=1 \n"); #endif[/code] Would removing the ifdef help so that the autodetach is run regardless of OS (me...
by rasta
Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:57 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Dev, Thank you for the info. I guess it is just a basic incompatibility between Solaris 10 and oss 4.2. It is still more or less random if oss will attach properly to Solaris, but an ossdetect and a reboot or two usually gets oss working. Is Solaris 11 the same as opensolaris? Is opensolaris indepen...
by rasta
Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:33 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Dev, I posted this in this forum a while back: ********************* Dev, Here is some info about the unloading from the opensolaris opensound forum: "One way to help reduce the chance of modunload -i 0 from auto-unloading modules is to export a property -- "ddi-no-autodetach". This w...
by rasta
Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:19 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Dev, The behavior I'm getting now (with "sleep 10" added to /etc/init.d/oss) is that upon first boot, oss will not attach, but if I simply reboot, it will attach. Below is the edited oss script. Did I edit it correctly? > cat /etc/init.d/oss #!/bin/sh if test -f /etc/oss.conf then . /etc/o...
by rasta
Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:26 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Dev,

Thank you very much for the tip. I've implemented it, and I've had perfect attachment on 2 boots in a row. I'll keep you posted. I'm lovin' build 2004 so far!

Cheers!
by rasta
Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:23 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: v4.2-2003-i386 installation
Replies: 4
Views: 18471

Re: v4.2-2003-i386 installation

Hi, Get OSS 4.2 build 2004 - adding the devfsadm to the soundon scripts helps fix the disappearing devlinks problem. The root cause of the links disappearing is that moduload -i 0 is called at the end of boot up and it knocks out the device links of all device drivers that are not in use. Are you s...
by rasta
Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:21 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

Re: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

Using Solaris 10 u8 x64 on Intel hardware (using Host Driver: Windows DirectSound, Controller: ICH AC97 for VirtualBox 4.0.0 guest), build 2004 will still attach only intermittently. Workarounds are needed to get oss to function normally. DEFINITIVE step-by-step instructions are needed. It seems tha...
by rasta
Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:27 am
Forum: Solaris
Topic: OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!
Replies: 12
Views: 42191

OSS v4.2 build 2004 - looking GOOD!

OSS 4.2 build 2004 installed perfectly on Solaris 10 u8 x64. However, adding "ossdetect" without quotes to the end of /etc/profile was necessary to get oss to attach properly. After doing that, oss works great, even after a reboot. I'll post again if I run into any problems. Good job, Open...
by rasta
Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:31 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: OSS v4.2 Build 2003
Replies: 1
Views: 24031

Re: OSS v4.2 Build 2003

This build will not attach to Solaris 10 x86, which was the case with build 2002. OSS is still not properly functional for Solaris 10, as has been documented extensively in the Solaris forums. Please fix.
by rasta
Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:19 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: oss_sadasupport@0:sound missing after reboot
Replies: 5
Views: 21740

Re: oss_sadasupport@0:sound missing after reboot

Dev, Here is some info about the unloading from the opensolaris opensound forum: "One way to help reduce the chance of modunload -i 0 from auto-unloading modules is to export a property -- "ddi-no-autodetach". This will not prevent intentional unloads of modules by an end-user, but it...
by rasta
Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:22 pm
Forum: Solaris
Topic: oss_sadasupport@0:sound missing after reboot
Replies: 5
Views: 21740

Re: oss_sadasupport@0:sound missing after reboot

Dev, He IS using Solaris 10. OSS 4.2 b2002 will not attach to Solaris 10, as myself and others have documented extensively in this forum and in the thread for the release announcement. Even the install of this oss build will fail unless a directory is manually made by the user prior to install. Your...
by rasta
Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:20 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: OSS 4.2 Build 2002
Replies: 4
Views: 28297

Re: OSS 4.2 Build 2002

Rolf, Thank you for the tip. Making that directory makes the install run smoothly. However, oss 4.2 b2002 still will not attach to Solaris 10 after install, as has been noted by several users in the Solaris forum. Other manual fixes have been suggested by Vitaly, but even with them, oss on Solaris 1...
by rasta
Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:03 am
Forum: Solaris
Topic: oss 4.2 build 2001 will not attach to Solaris 10
Replies: 16
Views: 49541

Re: oss 4.2 build 2001 will not attach to Solaris 10

pkgrm -A was the only way I knew to get oss to uninstall, as pkgrm oss did not work. In the future, how should I uninstall oss if pkgrm (without -A) fails?

Go to advanced search