Difference between revisions of "Talk:OSS Compatible Applications"
From Open Sound System
m (I'm not sure how many years, really) |
m (Clarify BSD status) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# It underestimates the number of apps which work with OSS, which creates a bad impression. | # It underestimates the number of apps which work with OSS, which creates a bad impression. | ||
− | #: OSS has been in existence for many years, and | + | #: OSS has been in existence for many years, and the OSS API is used by FreeBSD's soundsystem (and soon Solaris as well). We could take almost every sound category app from freshmeat and put it here, except for the MIDI-using ones. Not to mention all SDL/libao/Portaudio/etc. based applications and games. |
# It isn't entirely reproducible. | # It isn't entirely reproducible. | ||
#: Linux distros patch their apps, and in some cases it prevents the app from working with OSS on default configuration, so you'll have some apps which work easily in one distro, and not at the other. User then may find this page, and get all confused. | #: Linux distros patch their apps, and in some cases it prevents the app from working with OSS on default configuration, so you'll have some apps which work easily in one distro, and not at the other. User then may find this page, and get all confused. | ||
My suggestion to rescue this page is to make it show instead how sound needs can be satified using apps which support OSS. Something like http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=149258𤜊 (The wiki is however a OS-agnostic area unlike OpenSolaris). In soundbyte form: use-centric rather than app-centric. [[User:Cesium|Cesium]] 16:06, 19 April 2008 (CEST) | My suggestion to rescue this page is to make it show instead how sound needs can be satified using apps which support OSS. Something like http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=149258𤜊 (The wiki is however a OS-agnostic area unlike OpenSolaris). In soundbyte form: use-centric rather than app-centric. [[User:Cesium|Cesium]] 16:06, 19 April 2008 (CEST) |
Revision as of 14:07, 19 April 2008
I seem to be deleting your contribution on a regular basis :-(, so I won't do that here. But I really don't like this page currently stands.
There are two main problem here:
- It underestimates the number of apps which work with OSS, which creates a bad impression.
- OSS has been in existence for many years, and the OSS API is used by FreeBSD's soundsystem (and soon Solaris as well). We could take almost every sound category app from freshmeat and put it here, except for the MIDI-using ones. Not to mention all SDL/libao/Portaudio/etc. based applications and games.
- It isn't entirely reproducible.
- Linux distros patch their apps, and in some cases it prevents the app from working with OSS on default configuration, so you'll have some apps which work easily in one distro, and not at the other. User then may find this page, and get all confused.
My suggestion to rescue this page is to make it show instead how sound needs can be satified using apps which support OSS. Something like http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=149258𤜊 (The wiki is however a OS-agnostic area unlike OpenSolaris). In soundbyte form: use-centric rather than app-centric. Cesium 16:06, 19 April 2008 (CEST)